Our aim has been to raise awareness among local decision makers about opportunities to influence conditions that make it possible for all residents to move up the economic ladder and lead healthy, prosperous lives.
As evidenced by responses to ICMA’s recent survey, we understand that the phrase “economic mobility” might not be one you routinely use to describe your priorities or service areas. Or you might think of it as just a large-city issue, beyond the capacity of smaller communities to address. But as senior program manager Bailey Barnett notes in her summary of survey findings, you might be doing (or have capacity to do) more than you think.
To further illustrate this point, this supplement highlights examples of how ICMA members, along with their colleagues and partners, in a wide range of communities are working together to (explicitly and implicitly) address economic mobility challenges faced by residents.
A number of these examples come from participants in our first Economic Mobility and Opportunity peer learning cohort. This group of 10 diverse localities included rural and urban communities; towns, cities, and counties; and small to large geographies and populations. The teams of local government leaders and community partners chose to focus on specific challenges related to housing, job opportunities and business development, engaging vulnerable populations, support for working families, and more. They worked to carve out appropriate and feasible roles for their local governments relative to other types of local and regional partners with different budgets, authorities, and expertise.
For further inspiration, we invited colleagues with deep expertise in policy and programming in support of livable communities and smart growth to offer their commentary on how economic mobility issues show up in their work.
